Department of Disinvestment, Ministry of Finance, Govt. of India |
21 May 2012 8:38:53 AM |
| Advertisements for Advisors |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GOVERNMENT
OF INDIA MINISTRY
OF DISINVESTMENT
ENGAGEMENT
OF COORDINATOR CUM ADVISOR (CA) FOR DISINVESTMENT
IN IBP CO. LTD. (IBP) THROUGH DOMESTIC OFFERING 1.
Introduction 1.1
IBP Co. Ltd. (IBP) is a Public Sector Undertaking
(PSU) under the administrative control of Ministry of Petroleum &
Natural Gas. IBP is engaged in manufacturing and marketing of Industrial
Explosives and Cryo Vessels and marketing of petroleum products.
The paid-up capital of the company is Rs.22.15 crore. Indian Oil
Corporation holds about 53.58% of the equity and as such IBP is its
subsidiary. At present,
Government of India holds 26% of the equity of the company. The institutions
and the public hold the balance 20.42%. The shares of the company are listed
on the various stock exchanges in the country.
The company has 2093 retail outlets, 378 SKO/LDO agencies and 64 LPG
distributorships. The total turnover and profit -after tax of the
company during the year 2002-03 are Rs.8991 crore and Rs.88 crore
respectively. 2.
Government decision
2.1
Government of India (GOI) intends to disinvest its remaining stake of
26% of the equity shares of IBP through domestic offer through the Book
Building process. Expressions of Interest
are invited, by 17.00 Hrs. (IST) on 19.9.2003, from reputed
merchant/investment bankers either singly or as a consortium, with specific
expertise in disinvestment through capital market offerings to act as
Coordinator-cum-Advisor and to assist and advise the Government in this
process. 3.
Responsibilities of the Coordinator-cum-Advisor (CA)
3.1
The Coordinator-cum-Advisor (CA) would be required, inter alia, to
advise on the timings and the modalities of the capital market offer in order
to ensure best returns to the Government. They would be required to advise on
all aspects of the offering including assisting Government in identification
and selection of legal advisors, accountants, other intermediaries and
coordinate their work under the guidance of the Government, complete
due-diligence, draft offering documents, red herring prospectus, etc. for the
issue, coordinate with printers for timely completion and distribution of
offering documents and other relevant material needed for sale. Their
responsibilities would include pre-market survey, road shows, book building
and generation of interest amongst prospective investors. The CA will also be
required to do the market research along with pricing and allocation of shares
and after sale support. They would also guide and facilitate in obtaining
necessary approvals, completion of regulatory requirements including Listing
etc. and perform all other responsibilities connected with such offerings.
The responsibilities of CA would also include appropriate underwriting
connected with the offering.
3.2
Since it is desirable for Government to have two
Coordinator-cum-Advisor, having adequate experience in similar offerings, Government would
select two parties who together form a team and will be
called Joint Coordinator-cum-Advisors (JCA). The JCAs selected will also have
to form a syndicate including co-managers in consultation with Government. 4.
Submission of Expression of Interest 4.1
Reputed merchant/investment bankers with adequate and specific
expertise in disinvestment through capital market offering are invited to
submit Expressions of Interest either singly or as a consortium for selection
as CA to Shri G. Ramachandran, Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Disinvestment,
Room No.205, II Floor, Block No.11, CGO Complex, New Delhi-110 003. The
bidders would be required to deposit along with the Expression of Interest, a
non-refundable earnest fee of INR 40,000 by way of a demand draft drawn in
favour of ‘Pay and Accounts Officer, Ministry of Disinvestment, New
Delhi’ payable at Delhi. GOI reserves the sole right to accept or reject
any or all Expressions of Interest without assigning any reasons therefor.
Together with the Expression of Interest, the following details are to
be sent:
(i) Full
particulars of the constitution, ownership and main business activities of the
prospective Coordinator-cum Advisor (bidder). In case of consortium bids, the
particulars of the coordinating firm having the principal responsibility for
the mandate as well as those of other parties.
(ii)
Unabridged Annual
Reports or audited financial accounts for the last three years of all the
parties.
(iii) Details
of the pending litigation and contingent liabilities, if any, that could
affect the performance of the bidder under the mandate, as also details of any
past conviction and pending litigation against sponsors/partners, Directors
etc., and any areas of possible conflicts of interest.
(iv)
Details of Domestic issues managed as Lead Manager/Book Runner or
Co-Lead Manager/Co-Book Runner, in respect of issue size of more than Rs.100
crore are to be furnished in the format given in Annexure-I. (v)
Understanding
of the Company
Details
of understanding and SWOT analysis of IBP may be furnished. (vi)
Experience
and presence in India A brief note evidencing the
prospective CA’s strength in India indicating the number and addresses of
offices, manpower and investment, if any, in the Indian capital market as
follows:
(a)
Commitment to India, indicating net investment In Indian capital market
(b)
The quality and quantity of presence in India with specific reference
to research team (c)
Number and places of offices with address, manpower with the investment
banking team.
(vii)
Broad Scheme for the issue a)
Suggestion of Optimal syndicate structure for maximizing quality and
quantity of demand.
b)
Proposal on syndicate incentivization.
c)
Strategy for pre-marketing.
d)
Proposed Road Show venues and reasons for suggesting the same. e)
Commitment(s) which may act either as a constraint or as a conflicting
interest to your involvement in the proposed issue
(viii)
Manpower
commitment
Details of the team that will be handling the
proposed issue, their status in the organization, their background,
qualification, experience and present addresses.
(ix)
Marketing
and Demand Analysis Details
of the following should be furnished:
a)
Equity sales and distribution capacity with demonstrated capability of
selling Indian issues in particular, Asian equity and global equity along with
distribution network. b)
Demand analysis as projected and details of sectors influencing demand.
c)
Strategy for marketing shares and identification of target investor
groups. d)
Identification of key selling points.
(x)
Valuation
Methodology
Details of the valuation methodology to be followed in determining the final pricing of the issue, indicating clearly the pricing level proposed to be underwritten. (xi)
Quality
of Research
Research strength in the country, sector, region, world based on rating
as established by independent global surveys.
Details should be given relating to research capabilities and
experience and background of the research team.
(xii)
After-market support
Strength in lending after market support, with specific reference to
Indian issues managed in the past.
(xiii)
Underwriting capabilities
Underwriting capabilities
including details of capital base of the Investment Bank available to support
such underwriting, record of past underwriting commitments and experience.
Also, the details of any of the underwriting commitments (including hard
underwriting), which could not be met, may also be furnished.
(xiv)
Time Schedule
A realistic time schedule
for launching the proposed Domestic issue with complete break up of activities
to be undertaken by various agencies involved in the issue.
4.2
All the information sought above, and any other additional information
considered necessary by the bidder, should be sent, in 3 copies, maximum of 10
pages (font size 12) to the officer mentioned in para 4.1 as a part of the
Expression of Interest (EOI). 5.
Eligibility 5.1
Bidders should have had handled domestic equity issues in respect of
issue size of more than Rs.100 crore in Book Building process. 5.2
Government of India has issued guidelines prescribing certain
qualifications for Advisors for disinvestment process. A copy of the
guidelines (OM No. 6/4/2001-DD-II dated 13th July, 2001) is
enclosed (Annexure-II). The interested parties are requested to
carefully go through the guidelines and after satisfying that they are
qualified to act as Joint Coordinator-cum-Advisor, furnish the following
certificate as a part of the proposal/EOI.
“We
certify that there has been no conviction by a Court of Law or
indictment/adverse order by a regulatory authority for a grave offence against
us or any of our sister concern. It is further certified that there is no
investigation pending against us or our sister concern or the CEO,
Directors/Managers/ Employees of our concern or of our sister concern. It is
certified that no conflict of interest exists as on date and if in future such
a conflict of interest arises we will intimate the Government of India of the
same.” 6.
Presentation
6.1
Qualified interested parties would be required to make a presentation
of their credentials and the proposed transaction, before an Inter-Ministerial
Group (IMG) at New Delhi in the Committee Room of Ministry of Disinvestment,
Room No.515, Block No.14, CGO Complex, New Delhi-110003.
The exact date and time of the presentation will be intimated
separately. The parties will be assessed broadly on the following criteria: a)
Experience and capabilities in
handling similar transactions as Advisors/ Coordinators. b)
Sector expertise and experience. c)
Understanding of the IBP. d)
Deal team qualification and manpower commitment to the deal. e)
Marketing strategy and after market support. f
)
Local presence and level of commitment to India. g)
Global presence and distribution capabilities. h)
Research capabilities.
6.2
Immediately after their presentation is over, the parties are required
to hand over a sealed envelope containing the fee quotes mentioned in para 7
below to the Chairman of the Inter-Ministerial-Group. The fee quoted should be
unconditional and gross of all taxes. 7.
Fee
7.1
The Coordinator-cum-Advisor will need to quote a fee for the domestic
issue as a percentage of disinvestment proceeds through domestic offering in a
sealed envelope. The fee quoted should be unconditional and gross of all
taxes. A drop-dead fee,
payable in case Government abandons at any stage after the process has been
started by the Government/Advisors, may also be indicated separately.
7.2
The bid should be unconditional. Expenditure on account of fees to
legal/accounting or any other consultant, as well as to printers appointed by
GOI, should not be included in the financial bid. Expenses on Road Shows,
conferences and travel, boarding and lodging, only of Government/IBP officials
will be borne by the Government. The
CA will, however, pay the travel related expenses and all the other expenses
including those related to their due diligence, their road show expenses and
pre-marketing expenses in connection with the offerings, expenses of legal
counsels, accountants and other experts appointed by them for communication
and for preparation of offering circular, prospectus, etc. The CA will be
liable to pay taxes for their professional services as per laws of the land. 7.3
Government would select two parties and both of them would work as a
team. Both the
selected parties would be called Joint Coordinator-cum-Advisor (JCA). The JCAs
selected will also have to form a syndicate including co-managers in
consultation with Government. The
fee quoted by the selected Coordinator-cum-Advisor shall include provisions
for such other Coordinator and syndicate members who would be included, in
consultation with Government. The fee to be quoted by the
Coordinator-cum-Advisors would be shared equally between the two
Coordinator-cum-Advisors so appointed by Government. 8.
Procedure for Selection of the Coordinator-cum-Advisor (CA) 8.1
Based on the Expression of Interest received from the interested
parties, Government would request them to make a presentation before an
Inter-Ministerial Group (IMG) constituted by the Government.
8.2
The IMG would evaluate the parties based on their presentation and
shortlist them for the purpose of opening their financial bids.
The L1 party would be selected for the transaction and the L2 party
would be requested to match the fees quoted by L1.
In case L2 does not accept the offer, Government will make the offer to
the L3 and the process will continue till Government appoints two CAs.
8.3
The two CAs selected by Government would work as a team and both the
selected CAs would be called Joint Coordinator-cum-Advisors (JCA). The two
Joint Coordinator-cum-Advisors (JCAs) would share the aforesaid fees equally. 9.
Clarifications
9.1
If any further clarification is needed about the assignment, the
under-mentioned officer may be contacted. Shri G.
Ramachandran Deputy
Secretary Ministry of
Disinvestment II Floor,
Block No.11 CGO Complex Lodhi Road New Delhi -
110 003 Tel.
011-2436 8531 Fax 011-2436
6524 e-mail:
dsr@hub.nic.in
Annexure-I
Details
of Domestic Issues
(Value Rs. in Crore)
Annexure-II No.
6/4/2001-DD-II Government of
India Department of
Disinvestment Block 14, CGO
Complex New Delhi. Dated 13th
July 2001. OFFICE MEMORANDUM Subject:
Guidelines for qualification of Advisors for disinvestment process Government has examined the
issue of framing comprehensive and transparent guidelines defining the criteria
for selection of Advisors, so that the parties selected through competitive
bidding inspire public confidence. Earlier,
a set of criteria like sector experience, knowledge, commitment etc. used to be
prescribed. Based on experience and in consultation with concerned departments,
Government has decided to prescribe the following additional criteria for the
qualification/disqualification of the parties to act as Advisors to the
Government for the disinvestment transactions: (a)
Any conviction by a Court of Law
or indictment / adverse order by a regulatory authority for a grave offence
against the Advising concern or its sister concern would constitute a
disqualification. Grave offence
would be defined to be of such a nature that it outrages the moral sense of the
community. The decision in regard
to the nature of offence would be taken on a case-to-case basis after
considering the facts of the case and relevant legal principles by the
Government. Similarly, the decision
in regard to the relationship between the sister concerns would be taken, based
on relevant facts and after examining whether the two concerns are substantially
controlled by the same person/persons. (b)
In
case such a disqualification takes place, after the entity has already been appointed
as Advisor, the party would be under an obligation to withdraw voluntarily from
the disinvestment process, failing which the Government would have the liberty
to terminate the appointment / contract.
(c)
Disqualification shall continue
for a period that Government deems appropriate.
(d)
Any entity, which is
disqualified from participating in the disinvestment process, would not be
allowed to remain associated with it or get associated merely because it has
preferred an appeal against the order based on which it has been disqualified.
The mere pendency of appeal will have no effect on the disqualification.
(e)
The disqualification criteria
would come into effect immediately and would apply to all the Advisors already
appointed by the Government for various disinvestment transactions, which have
not yet been completed.
(f)
Before disqualifying a concern, a Show Cause Notice why it should not
disqualified would be issued to it and it would be given an opportunity to
explain its position.
(g) Henceforth,
these criteria will be prescribed in the advertisements seeking Expressions of
Interest (EOI) from the interested parties to act as Advisor.
Further, the interested parties shall be required to provide with their
EOI an undertaking to the effect that no investigation by a regulatory authority
is pending against them. In case
any investigation is pending against the concern or its sister concern or
against the CEO or any of its Directors/Managers/Employees, full details of such
investigation including the name of the investigating agency, the charge/offence
for which the investigation has been launched, name and designation of persons
against whom the investigation has been launched and other relevant information
should be disclosed, to the satisfaction of the Government. For other criteria
also, similar undertaking will be obtained along with EOI.
They would also have to give an undertaking that if they are disqualified
as per the prescribed criteria, at any time before the transaction is completed,
they would be required to inform the Government of the same and voluntarily
withdraw from the assignment.
(h)
The interested parties would also be required to give an undertaking that there
exists no conflict of interest as on the date of their appointment as Advisors
in handling of the transaction and that, in future, if such a conflict of
interest arises, the Advisor would immediately intimate the Government of the
same. For disinvestment proposes,
‘conflict of interest’ is defined to include engaging in any activity or
business by the Advisor in association with any third Party, during the
engagement, which would or may be reasonably expected to, directly or
indirectly, materially adversely affect the interest of Government of India or
the Company (being disinvested) in relation to the transaction, and in respect
of which the Advisor has or may obtain any proprietary or confidential
information during the engagement, that, if known to any other client of the
Advisor, could be used in any manner by such client to the material disadvantage
of Government of India or the Company (being disinvested) in the transaction.
The conflict of interest would be deemed to have arisen if any Advisor
firm/concern, has any professional or commercial relationship with any bidding
firm / concern for the same disinvestment transaction during the pendency of
such transaction. In this context,
both Advisor firm and bidding firm would mean the distinct and separate legal
entities and would not include their sister concern, group concern or affiliates
etc. The professional or commercial
relationship is defined to include acting on behalf of the bidder or undertaking
any assignment for the bidder of any nature, whether or not directly related to
disinvestment transaction.
(i)
On receiving information on conflict of interest, the Government would
give the option to the Advisor to either eliminate the conflict of interest
within a stipulated time or withdraw from the transaction and the Advisor would
be required to act accordingly, failing which Government would have the liberty
to terminate the appointment/contract.
Ad/-
(A.K.
Tewari) Under Secretary to the Government
of India |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||